BirdsEyeView
Active member
- Joined
- Oct 23, 2017
- Messages
- 345
Out of curiousity, why are players immune to criticism just because they wear a Redbird uniform? I do agree that posting it on a reported injury thread is distasteful, however, I also believe a message board's purpose is for people to provide their opinions regarding a player's value to a team on a game by game basis or on a macro level as a contributor to the program as a whole to make the NCAAs (our ultimate goal as a fan base right now). Some opinions are supported through fact, while others are not and based on other factors like bias (strength of the arguments).
With that said, Matt Hein is getting a full scholarship valued at over $30,000 (out of state tuition + room and board) and therefore his value to the program over replacement can be assessed by the fan base. We don't need to tip-toe around a kid's performance, but again...
Ricohill, et al. - it probably should not be voiced here on this thread. Maybe comment about it on the Drake game thread. Why did we perform better without his 17 minutes if that is your opinion?
For the record, I think he is a solid defensive asset for our roster, but his value can be deteriorated with turnovers and a lack of an offensive game that allows opposition to hone in on MY, PF and KE without the threat of that double hurting them with an open shooter.
Example: See Bradley game between the under 16 and under 12 of the first half (went from up 4 to down 4 in that 4 minute stretch he came in). A minus 8 in a short span that turned the game quickly on it's head for us.
With that said, Matt Hein is getting a full scholarship valued at over $30,000 (out of state tuition + room and board) and therefore his value to the program over replacement can be assessed by the fan base. We don't need to tip-toe around a kid's performance, but again...
Ricohill, et al. - it probably should not be voiced here on this thread. Maybe comment about it on the Drake game thread. Why did we perform better without his 17 minutes if that is your opinion?
For the record, I think he is a solid defensive asset for our roster, but his value can be deteriorated with turnovers and a lack of an offensive game that allows opposition to hone in on MY, PF and KE without the threat of that double hurting them with an open shooter.
Example: See Bradley game between the under 16 and under 12 of the first half (went from up 4 to down 4 in that 4 minute stretch he came in). A minus 8 in a short span that turned the game quickly on it's head for us.