Redbirdwarrior
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2017
- Messages
- 2,217
I think expecting a big turnaround this year is unfair/unrealistic. But with the portal now it’s not a 5 yr plan if your any good. Look at our opponents tonight, they still stunk last year, and we knocked them out of the MVC tour. But in year 2 they look pretty good. No way it should take 5 years in the current environment.
Three years minimum. Five on the high side and, honestly, five is probably more likely for a low/mid major than others because of the new portal rules where players are all essentially playing on one-year contracts with opt outs every season and seemingly endless eligibility (Remember when we made fun of Zach Lofton when he started at New Mexico State, his 5th college, at age 23? This is somehow becoming commonplace).
We have not even gotten to the point where the portal torpedos team growth and success, but as coach starts developing 1-2 star players into 15-20 PPG players, schools with bigger pedigrees and deeper NIL pockets are going to swoop in and take what they want.
All that to say is Coach took this job knowing it would be a challenge and knew it would take years (more than 2) to even start seeing any kind of advancement of the program on the court. You all were calling for Mullers head because you all wanted to tear it down. Guys, this is what torn down looks like. If not for the huge success that was the Horton game, this season would look like one of the very worst in school history. But it isn't. You had to tear down to build a foundation and Coach is doing just that. Would we prefer a foundation of 3 star recruits and 20 win seasons? Of course, but it isn't realistic. As many of us said during the "FIRE MULLER" debates, you are ASKING for 2-3 seasons of under 10 total wins. This is exactly what was expected by anyone with any logic.