Moser figured it out.gobirds72 said:CaliRdBrd said:malarch7 said:[Slow clap for this post: [emoji122].......[emoji122].......[emoji122].......[emoji122].......[emoji122]]
Now that we got that out of the way, LOL!!
While there are likely some hyperbolic responses on these threads that make it appear like fans want to castigate Muller & Co., it's equally annoying when peeps chime in with drippy, sanctimonious posts similar to the ones above. Again...
I don't believe anyone here denies Dan's character or passion for his players / coaching. If anyone outright did that, I would be on the frontlines defending HCDM.
The last two games showed promise for what making adjustments, playing to your strengths and limiting mistakes can yield for this team. That said, the facts that have led to years of 'just coming up short' over the last ~20 seasons - or more specifically the last 5-7 years - for this program have been consistent:
- LOADS of talent recruited into the system (I would say - of recent and perhaps with the exception of Wichita St. during their last few years in the MVC - ISU far and away has had the most/best collection of talent.
BUT
- Inability to balance talent with high basketball IQ / limiting bone-headed on-court decisions resulting in equally bone-headed losses.
Have to conclude that there's something amiss in the culture when continually plagued with such issues...
It's truly perplexing to me considering HCDM's origins playing for THE quintessential model of talent + smart basketball under Stallings (and - sorta tongue & cheek - being a Bone Scholar himself!, LOL!)
I mean Loyola - under a former ISU HC - brings together a collection of *somewhat* talented, but exceptionally smart basketball players (including a FROSH and a cple other underclassmen in the core rotation)...and make an unthinkable run to the FF. Meanwhile ISU with all their years of talent can't even get into the dance to have any chance at such a run (let alone winning a couple games). Ben Jacobsen is another example of having history bringing together "smart talent" capable of making deep, sustainable post season runs.
When will this come to fruition for this ISU program...in the face of all these years of being picked by prognosticators as "the mid-major team to watch"?
It's just so deflating when HCDM fields teams with such promise...only to perpetually fall short when it matters. As a Redbird alum ('97) who witnessed / covered the very best of what ISU produced under HCKS, I would say I've been *more* than patient. So, please be honest with yourselves in balancing evaluation of HCDMs character with rightful, smart criticism of his program's shortcomings.
I hope they can build on the last two victories with commitment to basketball competency and efficacy...yielding important wins en route to a conference tourney championship and long-awaited NCAA berth!
(Sidenote: HCDM's halftime and postgame comments in the BSU game were spot-on assessments. He's paid - relatively well - to turn around these issues and impart a culture of discipline in-balance with talent, which in-turn will lead to stacks if W's!)
Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk
100% this. Well written and spot on.
I agree! I have been fortunate enough to have the opportunity to live through the Donewald days (Lamb, Brad Duncan, Johnson, Stefanovic etc) to Bender, Stallings, Richardson, Moser, Janks, to now Muller! Donewald, and Stallings seem to be the only two that really knew how to build a program! It’s amazing to see the difference in each other’s views! I remember being upset that’s Donewald seem to never bring a Juco player in! He seem to make it work!