V Boy said:Too bad. Good size. But could never use it. Probably best for both sides.
Our transfers almost always improve wherever they land. It’s a shame, another year and another roster rebuild. Good luck Rey, appreciate you.
V Boy said:Too bad. Good size. But could never use it. Probably best for both sides.
jamminjamarsmiley said:BirdGrad2011 said:jamminjamarsmiley said:Can some one fill me in on the mysterious big man Dan is recruiting? Is his name Olajuwon or worthy? I don’t see how this late in the recruiting cycle you’re going to find much especially at the 5 which is probably the shallowest of the talent pools.
It’s clear to me next season is going to be another edition of chuck and duck. Maybe we will win 10 games?
Some of Dan’s best recruiting has been done in Spring.
Reeves was a nice get last year late in the game, because he did not get his big ten offer he held out for. Who else? All the high school talent is signed sealed and delivered at this point for the most part.
BirdGrad2011 said:What did you people expect? We were 1 scholarship over the limit so at least one had to leave. The writing was on the wall when he lost PT. You absolutely cannot cry about how bad the team was then get mad a role player leaves. Dan has 1 year to turn it around.
Reggie produced way more than Rey ... not even comparable. Reggie played his whole Freshman year with nobody over 6'4 after Middlebrooks was kicked off the team. Reggie held his own and you could see the potential. Rey played plenty of minutes with Keith or Abou.Loyl2u said:So what real center has got the minutes Rey got and produced more? Reggie? he avg. 20 min and avg 8 pts/5 rb and Rey played almost every minute this year w/4 guards on the floor to help defend/rebound. What would his stats have been if you actually ran an offense which put him on the block?
His later conduct withstanding, I loved Reggie and always wanted him to get more minutes, but I think people have selective memory, there were plenty of head shaking moments, especially Reggie’s freshman year, but he was a freshman and he got better the more he played.
Totally disagree on the “Rey didn’t play well with Fisher”. When Fisher was playing against a 4, he was most successful -had the ability to create, didn’t have to guard the 5 freeing him from fouls that reduced his minutes and he got more rebounds. When he was the sole 4/5 on court, he set the high screen. Of course playing a 5 with Fisher would have meant that one of the guards that couldn’t play out front or guard played less. Now I didn’t say the team would score more points when Fisher/Rey were both on the floor, I said better competing against the other team. Better defensively, better on boards. When the centers were off the court, who was defending the best 4 for the opponent, the Birds got killed so bad by that position, they had to go to zone and that worked as a surprise, but not after people prepared for it.
redbird Recon said:WoodlandWarrior said:This begs the question...with his real and/or perceived deficiencies, why was he recruited in the first place? We’ve had too many project “bigs” over the years that don’t pan out ———- Strandmark, Carlwell, and now Rey.
What about Rey made him a project? He wasn't skinny. He didn't have an immense lack of coordination or court sense.
When I read project, I think of a kid who will take a year or two before they even see the floor.
Rey scored 228 points over the course of his first two seasons on campus.
For size and skill set coming in, I'd compare him to Dinma. He scored 24 points in his first 2 seasons, one of which was a redshirt year.
redblood said:BirdGrad2011 said:What did you people expect? We were 1 scholarship over the limit so at least one had to leave. The writing was on the wall when he lost PT. You absolutely cannot cry about how bad the team was then get mad a role player leaves. Dan has 1 year to turn it around.
What do you think is going to happen? Guys DO get better after their sophomore years all over the country. Just not at ISU. I’m sure we will be much better off starting over again with the guy who scored 5 points a game in JUCO ball. Tired of it, addition by subtraction nonsense
BirdGrad2011 said:redblood said:BirdGrad2011 said:What did you people expect? We were 1 scholarship over the limit so at least one had to leave. The writing was on the wall when he lost PT. You absolutely cannot cry about how bad the team was then get mad a role player leaves. Dan has 1 year to turn it around.
What do you think is going to happen? Guys DO get better after their sophomore years all over the country. Just not at ISU. I’m sure we will be much better off starting over again with the guy who scored 5 points a game in JUCO ball. Tired of it, addition by subtraction nonsense
You can’t look at the Russian as a replacement for Rey. His replacement likely isn’t committed or on the roster. Rey did not fit the mold of Muller bigs. The best have been Fayne, Hawkins, etc. Hawkins stretched the floor and could still handle his own down low. Fayne didn’t stretch the floor nearly as much, but was athletic enough to get the job done and played much better defense. Rey didn’t fit either mold.
ricohill said:So who do we replace these guys with??
BirdGrad2011 said:ricohill said:So who do we replace these guys with??
Jucos or transfers likely. There is already more names in the transfer portal than last year by a long shot.
ricohill said:BirdGrad2011 said:ricohill said:So who do we replace these guys with??
Jucos or transfers likely. There is already more names in the transfer portal than last year by a long shot.
Does he get a big?? I wonder what he’s looking for?
redblood said:V Boy said:Too bad. Good size. But could never use it. Probably best for both sides.
Our transfers almost always improve wherever they land. It’s a shame, another year and another roster rebuild. Good luck Rey, appreciate you.