crazzymark
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2017
- Messages
- 1,899
better location, more seating and a central location..
ThisIsTheLineup said:There usually two feet of snow in St. Louis at the time. It makes travel difficult.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Santa Cason said:ThisIsTheLineup said:There usually two feet of snow in St. Louis at the time. It makes travel difficult.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
This will be my third St. Louis winter. We haven’t had two feet of snow combined in the first two.
That being said, there’s no realistic
stadium to play the game in.
cubird said:The Dome is not available? Only use for motorcross?
fourthandshort said:Frisco makes more sense than St Louis for any outdoor venue. Both are easy to fly to, so that is a draw. But weather has to be deciding factor, and then venue size. Risk of snow and cold can't ignored.
Adunk33 said:When we played in Frisco, it snowed. It was cold. It was probably an anomaly. I think the Birds should get back before we say they should move its location.
If the Birds make another Natty, most of us are there, regardless of the location.
I would not like to see it moved to an FBS Stadium, because that just pumps up the big boys further, more clearly dividing FBS and FCS. FBS would look at it like "Aw, these FCS teams end of the season goal is to play at our home field." Seems silly. I'm sure there are plenty of other soccer stadiums around the country that would be a good fit. Just please keep it outside. NDSU gets to play 7-8 games in a dome all year, no need to give them that additional advantage.