RedbirdFanatic32
Active member
- Joined
- Jul 20, 2017
- Messages
- 260
I think it's fair to conclude "koolaid" from those comments in a vacuum. But the more likely truth is that most of the posters of those comments, feel (and have probably already posted) that it's time for Dan to go, and that his mistakes have led to losses, and with that point being made, they focus on the additional things going on in a game. They could have the inverse perspective to your kool-aid view: that posters that solely focus on the Dan problem are ignoring the many other factors that impact the game, and are just going over what we already know/agree on. The situation at ISU is like being caught in a traffic jam. Some want to solely focus on the situation that caused it. Others acknowledge what caused it and now focus on things that compound it in the more immediate vicinity. Neither one is wrong per se, but I think a kool-aid drinker (at least in my view) would be a poster who would claim after every L that our next game will start the run that'll make everything better, want to give Dan an extension, etc. People pointing out questionable officiating happens at every game in every sport at every fan base. Its a big umbrella (80% 90?) if all those fans are kool-aid drinkers. Jason Garrett needed to be fired in Dallas, but does that mean they can't talk about the Dez Bryant catch that wasn't a catch, without being labeled a Garrett sympathizer?This is what I meant yesterday about Kool and. The we almost had em attitude. Hey, fellas that game goes in the loss column still. All the ref excuses. Lol. It wasn't the refs guys. It was Dan showing he can't coach. Oh, it was Sy being out. Most teams have someone out. Next man up. All the excuses that show up after games. No, those go on Dan. He is the head coach in a top tier mid major conference.