You referring to the tv crew?Even the Drake announcers said it was a foul AND why the hell did we have to listen to Drake guys for a home game anyway.
I’m with you in theory, but we already had close to a half dozen stoppages for video review; replays killed the flow of overtime and the final two minutes of regulation.They originally called the Reeves play out of bounds on Drake. I believe Drake asked for a review. After they reviewed, they saw it was a foul, but last touched by Reeves. I would like to see refs have the authority to either a) leave the call as stands because they saw a foul happened or b) actually reward Reeves the free throws since Drake asked for the review.
What stands out to me is the 9 ft’s for reeves. Doesn’t look like we were homered to much!Check out that gameflow... doesn't get more back and forth than that.
View attachment 602
Reeves shot 9 FT’s- you call that homered? Thank god Pollard wasn’t there.Went to bed mad and woke up mad. I thought Dan handled the no calls the best he could without getting fined. His postgame comments paraphrased were watching the video he pointed out the specific fouls but then said the refs did a great job. . What is even more egregious is with 9 seconds to go in regulation time same situation but Drake with the ball the refs didn’t hesitate to call a foul on us. Frankly over time refereeing tends to even out in a game BUT the timing of these no calls clearly influenced the outcome of the game. Just really feel bad for the kids.
Never said we got homered. Just pointed out the TIMING of the last two no calls. If you read my post I pointed out that generally it evens out.Reeves shot 9 FT’s- you call that homered? Thank god Pollard wasn’t there.
No doubt, losing Sy is huge. We got 14 points from Liam. That’s more than enough to win this game. It’s always someone else fault when you lose. It can’t be that you choked and couldn’t get the job done. That’s the history behind Muller. His teams had choked away so many games- and it’s never the players until you mention the buck stops with Dan.This is what I meant yesterday about Kool and. The we almost had em attitude. Hey, fellas that game goes in the loss column still. All the ref excuses. Lol. It wasn't the refs guys. It was Dan showing he can't coach. Oh, it was Sy being out. Most teams have someone out. Next man up. All the excuses that show up after games. No, those go on Dan. He is the head coach in a top tier mid major conference.
Ok- then we agree we lost and didn’t get the job done. Enough with the excuses! Because I’m sure the refs came into this game and targeted our team. Because we shit more free throws than they did. LolNever said we got homered. Just pointed out the TIMING of the last two no calls. If you read my post I pointed out that generally it evens out.
Who picks the chokers to come here. He obviously brings a lot here so that is on Dan.No doubt, losing Sy is huge. We got 14 points from Liam. That’s more than enough to win this game. It’s always someone else fault when you lose. It can’t be that you choked and couldn’t get the job done. That’s the history behind Muller. His teams had choked away so many games- and it’s never the players until you mention the buck stops with Dan.
I agree...I don't think there was any bias. Bad timing on some calls at the end, but that's basketball.What stands out to me is the 9 ft’s for reeves. Doesn’t look like we were homered to much!
I agree...the students cost us the game. Children should be seen not heard!Our student section chanting “Ref You Suck!” probably didn’t help our cause, either…