There are two legitimate strategies. Pressure defense to force a turnover. Foul immediately. With pressure defense you give a set amount of time and if
The Birds are giving up more points than any team in conference and give up more opponent rebounds than anybody accept Valpo- in other words they are the worst combined Defensive/rebounding team in the conference-based upon the Birds defense/rebounding this season, this should have been a predetermined course. If you had a lock down defensive team that lead the conference in points given up and hadn“t just given up a 10-0 run, and were out rebounding your opponent(ISUb out rebounded the Birds) MAYBE, but I still think that you go for the steal/foul immediately- and yes I was screaming foul at the tv screenI mean…I didn’t say it….
From the postgame show:
“They got the last one(offensive rebound) there,I will certainly second guessing not fouling with 35 seconds left. They’re such a good free throw shooting team, I just thought we had a better chance to get a rebound with 6 seconds left, down 1. We have a play we can run with 6 seconds left that I feel very comfortable with and if we just get that clean rebound, I can call a quick timeout and now you have a chance to win it. Either way when it doesn’t work, certainly I feel like, foul, extend the game. Neese wasn’t going to miss free throws so I didn’t want to foul him, and make it a three point game but again, certainly second guessing that at this point but, that’s how the game works. “
Per ESPNs play-by-play, Neese secured a rebound with 30 seconds to go and hoisted a 3 pointer with 5 seconds. The ball was rebounded by Indy state with 2 seconds left, when Kendall fouled. So my biggest question would be, with the amount of times the players have bobbled the ball out of bounds and scrambles for rebounds, what gave coach confidence they’d be able to secure a “clean rebound” with less than 5 seconds to go? Part of me thinks Coach wasn’t 100% sure how much time was left in the game.
I’ll be the first to tell you that I do not know everything about basketball but it seems down 3 with 30 seconds to go and the ball would be better than (best case scenario) being down 1 with less than 5, and having to go the full length of the court.