They have my deepest sympathy, NOT!ISU FAN 1 said:By 32 on neutral floor.
ISU FAN 1 said:By 32 on neutral floor.
I’m sure they would. Just enjoyed Marshall’s sour puss on the bench.redbirds2000 said:ISU FAN 1 said:By 32 on neutral floor.
So you are saying OU would beat us by 40?
RBFANTOO said:They have my deepest sympathy, NOT!ISU FAN 1 said:By 32 on neutral floor.
redbirds2000 said:ISU FAN 1 said:By 32 on neutral floor.
So you are saying OU would beat us by 40?
bombay said:The game is passing marshall by.
ISU FAN 1 said:By 32 on neutral floor.
SgtHulka said:RBFANTOO said:They have my deepest sympathy, NOT!ISU FAN 1 said:By 32 on neutral floor.
:clap: :clap: :clap:
Btw. D3 Dubuque thumping UNI by 10 with 12 minutes to go. They may get The Yak before we get our shot.
Jsnhbe1Birds said:A down year for the shox is the nit. Im being serious. That must be nice. Marshall is a douche but he's a good coach and the game isn't passing him by. A lot of people left all at once. Trasfers, graduates, foregoing eligibility. And, they'll still make the nit with a bare cupboard.
Shox RPI is 103Jsnhbe1Birds said:A down year for the shox is the nit. Im being serious. That must be nice. Marshall is a douche but he's a good coach and the game isn't passing him by. A lot of people left all at once. Trasfers, graduates, foregoing eligibility. And, they'll still make the nit with a bare cupboard.
Reggie Redbird said:Jsnhbe1Birds said:A down year for the shox is the nit. Im being serious. That must be nice. Marshall is a douche but he's a good coach and the game isn't passing him by. A lot of people left all at once. Trasfers, graduates, foregoing eligibility. And, they'll still make the nit with a bare cupboard.
Considering how much WSU pays Marshall and what they spend on MBB, would you say they have higher expectations than ISU or really any MVC program?
If you're one of the top paid coaches in MBB, regardless of conference, the expectations are likely to finish in th top 60-70 of teams. It may not happen every year, but they want a return on their investment.
With his contract, Marshall had all the leverage to get a potentially-budget crippling salary and essentially no buyout.
ChiRedbirdfan said:Reggie Redbird said:Jsnhbe1Birds said:A down year for the shox is the nit. Im being serious. That must be nice. Marshall is a douche but he's a good coach and the game isn't passing him by. A lot of people left all at once. Trasfers, graduates, foregoing eligibility. And, they'll still make the nit with a bare cupboard.
Considering how much WSU pays Marshall and what they spend on MBB, would you say they have higher expectations than ISU or really any MVC program?
If you're one of the top paid coaches in MBB, regardless of conference, the expectations are likely to finish in th top 60-70 of teams. It may not happen every year, but they want a return on their investment.
With his contract, Marshall had all the leverage to get a potentially-budget crippling salary and essentially no buyout.
Question...who gets more value out of their athletic program ISU or Wichita State? They both have the same budget of $27,800,000. ISU students/university subside the program in the amount of $19MM and Wichita States comparable subsidy is $7,800,000. I would vote to dump ISU football in a heart beat to have their bball program profile and conference affiliation but others may feel differently..
I don’t see getting rid of football after all the $$ that’s been thrown at it in recent years. But it wouldn’t bother me if they did get rid of it. Have to wonder how many women’s programs would fall without men’s football to help pay the bills?Jsnhbe1Birds said:ChiRedbirdfan said:Reggie Redbird said:Considering how much WSU pays Marshall and what they spend on MBB, would you say they have higher expectations than ISU or really any MVC program?
If you're one of the top paid coaches in MBB, regardless of conference, the expectations are likely to finish in th top 60-70 of teams. It may not happen every year, but they want a return on their investment.
With his contract, Marshall had all the leverage to get a potentially-budget crippling salary and essentially no buyout.
Question...who gets more value out of their athletic program ISU or Wichita State? They both have the same budget of $27,800,000. ISU students/university subside the program in the amount of $19MM and Wichita States comparable subsidy is $7,800,000. I would vote to dump ISU football in a heart beat to have their bball program profile and conference affiliation but others may feel differently..
I'd drop it too bug some think the chance for a second rate trophy is great. Either move up or get rid of it so you can focus all that money on to basketball.
ISU FAN 1 said:I don’t see getting rid of football after all the $$ that’s been thrown at it in recent years. But it wouldn’t bother me if they did get rid of it. Have to wonder how many women’s programs would fall without men’s football to help pay the bills?Jsnhbe1Birds said:ChiRedbirdfan said:Question...who gets more value out of their athletic program ISU or Wichita State? They both have the same budget of $27,800,000. ISU students/university subside the program in the amount of $19MM and Wichita States comparable subsidy is $7,800,000. I would vote to dump ISU football in a heart beat to have their bball program profile and conference affiliation but others may feel differently..
I'd drop it too bug some think the chance for a second rate trophy is great. Either move up or get rid of it so you can focus all that money on to basketball.
ChiRedbirdfan said:ISU FAN 1 said:I don’t see getting rid of football after all the $$ that’s been thrown at it in recent years. But it wouldn’t bother me if they did get rid of it. Have to wonder how many women’s programs would fall without men’s football to help pay the bills?Jsnhbe1Birds said:I'd drop it too bug some think the chance for a second rate trophy is great. Either move up or get rid of it so you can focus all that money on to basketball.
Fewer programs, be it mens or womens, would further benefit ISU athletics. Less Athlet Dept overhead and coaches salaries would also lead to fewer but better funded/supported sports. ISU athletic budget makes it difficult, if not impossible, to try and compete in every sport with the major conferences. The fewer sports for ISU the better, IMO. Think how nice the remaining facilities would be if we did not have football and a few other sports. We might stand a chance like Creighton and Wichita State...and possible Loyola if the President/Provost can make it happen.
btw I agree I don't see it ever happening absent a monumental sea change at ISU.