If we are talking promoting a conference rivalry as the "rivalry game", I think the only schools that really make sense would be SIU or UNI.Good question and I am not sure I have the answer. Though we have played EIU many many times it seems as though the rivalry was somewhat manufactured via the creation of the Mid-American classic title about a decade ago. ISU should absolutely play EIU on occasion for ease of scheduling purposes but to have them be a focal point of ISU's football schedule on an annual basis does not make much financial/university image/fan interest sense to me. I know others may disagree and I would like to hear their perspective. From a pure financial perspective why is ISU trading a 1 for 1 home game with EIU? Is this one for one home game a gift to EIU or am I overstating ISU's athletic value vs EIU's?
Beyond EIU, if ISU is going to manufacture/promote an annual football rival game how about considering the following:
+promote playing a rival that the entire ISU university would like to be associated with in terms of academic profile/image...."You are who you hang or are associated with". This is the main reason I like the ISU / Bradley hoops rivalry and I do not like the EIU football rivalry. EIU is a struggling regional school and ISU should try to avoid being associated with EIU. It is also a reason I dislike to the Murray State addition to the MVC.
+if possible try to promote/manufacture a rivalry with a conference mate so that it can benefit all other ISU sports when those games are played
If the Texas vs Texas A&M and the Nebraska vs Oklahoma football rivalries can be discontinued due to bigger considerations then there is plenty of precedence to end this simple ISU vs EIU annual football rivalry game so that ISU can try to move onto something more meaningful....maybe we don't have a football rival game for awhile and just try to schedule better value opponents?
I'm curious if people on here would prefer an annual rivalry game with EIU or WIU?