Trey_Guidry4three
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jan 28, 2018
- Messages
- 1,929
Look, I like Dan Muller. I like the scheduling by Dan and I like the fact he isnt afraid to play anybody. I dont think Dan is a "players coach" and that is starting to show more and more. Yes, you need discipline but you cant be throwing your team under the bus in public and any time in a game someone makes a mistake you bench them. With that said, I thought Jank had more talent on his teams and better recruiter than Dan. The players liked him more.Bird Friend said:Trey_Guidry4three said:Bird Friend said:All that fussing about doing better, getting out of mediocrity, and you want to go back to Jank, which by his performance also means the NIT is the best case scenario for ISU. You don't want better, you just want Muller gone. Thank you for the clarification.
Do you think Jankovich brought more talent to ISU than Muller has?
Deflection. You've made your case for the NIT.
The scheduling philosophy could be improved by Jank but that has proven to not matter in this conference.