TIMMY
Well-known member
No stadium looks good empty. I'd trade stadiums with the Bunnies in a second. I don't care how many empty seats they have. That place is gorgeous.BallwinBird2012 said:fourthandshort said:redbirddad10 said:As always 4th does a great job of laying out the facts. Glad to hear the attendance has grown but it still doesn't appear that we have any lack of capacity for most of the home games. Until it really becomes an issue I would contend we focus on what will impact the program the most. State of the art facilities for the athletes, indoor practice facility, Meanwhile Market the heck out of the program to Blo No and Central Illinois and continue to make the game day experience at the current Hancock exciting and full of energy. I find a half filled facility of any size deflating, a full stadium of any size is exciting. Check some Friday nights in small towns, maybe only 1,000 fans but the stands are packed and you can feel the excitement. Watch a MAC game on TV, half filled stadium and even though they may have 15-18K in attendance if the Stadium seats 30-40 it looks horrible. Sell outs at Hancock are fun today. Focus on getting more of those.
agree with your point about playing before half empty stadiums .. so this is why I liked the ideas posted about temporary constructions in south end zone, just for big event games. Idea being to see if we can build the base to 15k+ for big games with a break even minimal investment. This would then be justification to donors to start working on Hancock 3.0.
But I would rather see the IPF first .. that will help team immediately .. both with recruitment and much better practice options during winter and inclement weather.
Also not a huge fan of half empty stadiums. Watched a little of South Dakota State's game this past weekend. It's about the third or fourth time I've watched one of their games since they opened their new stadium, and each game the stadium had entire sections completely empty. It's a beautiful stadium, but looks REALLY bad on them.