N.I.T.?

Bird Friend

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 17, 2017
Messages
12,566
cpacmel said:
https://twitter.com/AndyGlockner/status/969688635472715777?s=20

:text-+1:
cpacmel said:
Rpi isn’t dead. It’s on every team sheet as the first performances based metric.
Also the quadrants....are all records based on rpi.

:text-+1:
 

Hamdonger

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 17, 2017
Messages
6,509
You can throw stats at me all day long, and you're not necessarily wrong. You're probably right.

But 13 out of 18 wins in B10 play ought to get you an invite to The Dance. That's my story and I'm stickin' to it. Ticks me off when sub-.500 conf teams or even .500 teams get in over a good midmajor. Not 13-5, though. They deserve to be in.
 

SgtHulka

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 17, 2017
Messages
6,993
Humdinger said:
You can throw stats at me all day long, and you're not necessarily wrong. You're probably right.

But 13 out of 18 wins in B10 play ought to get you an invite to The Dance. That's my story and I'm stickin' to it. Ticks me off when sub-.500 conf teams or even .500 teams get in over a good midmajor. Not 13-5, though. They deserve to be in.

Lost AT Illinois. That's a resume killer.

I remember years ago on the PJ board, after we beat Penn St the illini fans were like "big woop". My response was that when you come at us at the end of the season touting that resume for an 10-8 program in the rough and tumble big 10 as being worthy, I'll remind you that at least 4 of the 10 came against big woops.
 

Hamdonger

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 17, 2017
Messages
6,509
All good arguments, pretty dang valid! Still seems wrong to me, though. Might be the only person here who sees it that way.

Curious. Has there ever been a Power Conference team, with a 72% winning percentage in conference play, who did NOT get in The Tourney??

I really don't know but I'd bet the odds are quite in favor of no - hasn't happened.
 

cpacmel

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 16, 2017
Messages
3,885
Humdinger said:
You can throw stats at me all day long, and you're not necessarily wrong. You're probably right.

But 13 out of 18 wins in B10 play ought to get you an invite to The Dance. That's my story and I'm stickin' to it. Ticks me off when sub-.500 conf teams or even .500 teams get in over a good midmajor. Not 13-5, though. They deserve to be in.

I do like to throw stats. Multiple ones.

Your only stat has been 13-5 in big ten play. That’s called cherry picking!

It’s like their 273 non conf sos doesn’t even exist. Whoops another stat. :shock:

Don’t worry when push comes to shove they will probably get in over Boise State or someone else that’s much more deserving .
 

Hamdonger

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 17, 2017
Messages
6,509
cpacmel said:
Your only stat has been 13-5 in big ten play.


Yup!

I'm FOR the midmajor. I think the bowdown to the P5's is BAD for the magic of The Dance. But in this case, my eyes can't leave 13 wins in a year in year out competitive P5conference.

Nebraska, more or less, is a midmajor basketball program in a Power conference. None of the experts will admit that but no one takes Nebraska serious. They're not considered amongst the elite, therefore IMO they are more apt to be treated - and are treated - AS a midmajor. 13 wins doesn't mean squat! They're not elite!! (Like us last year, for example) That's really my point.

But again, it's their fault. They should have went 18-0.

Have a great day, peeps.
 

DWRedbird

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 17, 2017
Messages
2,471
Humdinger said:
cpacmel said:
Your only stat has been 13-5 in big ten play.


Yup!

I'm FOR the midmajor. I think the bowdown to the P5's is BAD for the magic of The Dance. But in this case, my eyes can't leave 13 wins in a year in year out competitive P5conference.

Nebraska, more or less, is a midmajor basketball program in a Power conference. None of the experts will admit that but no one takes Nebraska serious. They're not considered amongst the elite, therefore IMO they are more apt to be treated - and are treated - AS a midmajor. 13 wins doesn't mean squat! They're not elite!! (Like us last year, for example) That's really my point.

But again, it's their fault. They should have went 18-0.

Have a great day, peeps.

The Big 10 wasn't really that competitive honestly. They were extremely top heavy, and once you get out of the top 4 teams, the rest really haven't done anything spectacular. That said, I will agree with you that I think Nebraska should be in consideration for an at large before a team like Texas...
 

ISU FAN 1

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 17, 2017
Messages
8,193
isuquinndog said:
Jay Bilias said during the Iona game that RPI is dead.

Bilas also said all at large berths should have been determined on Sunday, before the P5 conf tourney's start (less B1G of course.)

His reasoning is that P5s should be allowed to polish resumes in conf tourneys while non P5s essentially have no chance to do so.

By that logic, all regular season conference play should NOT be considered.

But this was Jay Bilas, NOT this Bilias character you are quoting. :lol:

Bilas is an ESPN guy, so by default, he's a BPI over RPI guy.
 

CaliRdBrd

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 17, 2017
Messages
5,639
Humdinger said:
cpacmel said:
Humdinger said:
Yeah, it really is IMO. Certainly within midmajor realm. But here's the deal. Somebody catches a break. Somebody gets screwed. :whistle:

Here's a crazy deal. Nebraska went 13-and-freaking-5 in the Big10 and some gurus are saying they're on the bubble. That is mind-boggling to me.

130 brackets on bracket matrix. 4 have Nebraska in.

They simply didn't play anyone in the non-conf.


Yup I realize that but a 72.2% winning percentage in B10 play doesn't carry any weight?

While they did beat Michigan, it's not as impressive when you realize they basically beat up on the bottom feeders (Minn, Rutgers, Illinois, Iowa, etc)
 

ISU FAN 1

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 17, 2017
Messages
8,193
SgtHulka said:
Humdinger said:
You can throw stats at me all day long, and you're not necessarily wrong. You're probably right.

But 13 out of 18 wins in B10 play ought to get you an invite to The Dance. That's my story and I'm stickin' to it. Ticks me off when sub-.500 conf teams or even .500 teams get in over a good midmajor. Not 13-5, though. They deserve to be in.

Lost AT Illinois. That's a resume killer.

I remember years ago on the PJ board, after we beat Penn St the illini fans were like "big woop". My response was that when you come at us at the end of the season touting that resume for an 10-8 program in the rough and tumble big 10 as being worthy, I'll remind you that at least 4 of the 10 came against big woops.

It delights me that losing to the Illini can kill a teams NCAA hopes.
 

cpacmel

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 16, 2017
Messages
3,885
Humdinger said:
Nebraska, more or less, is a midmajor basketball program in a Power conference. None of the experts will admit that but no one takes Nebraska serious. They're not considered amongst the elite, therefore IMO they are more apt to be treated - and are treated - AS a midmajor. 13 wins doesn't mean squat! They're not elite!! (Like us last year, for example) That's really my point.

Let's just sort thru some of this noise right here. Lots of mid-major programs playing in $180 mil arena's that seat 15K? Lots of mid-major programs paying their coaches 2 mil a year too?

Is Northwestern Elite? They got in with 10 Big Ten wins last year. Of course their schedule was light years better than Nebraska's was (49 to 270's). Can't just cherry pick one stat, such as conference record. I think you know that from following basketball all these years...

I think in the history of the Big Ten only 2 teams that won 11 or more conference games didn't dance. So it's not like it's the end all to dancing.
But again, it's their fault. They should have went 18-0.

They made their schedule. It's not like they are hurting to find games. Maybe EIU, North Dakota, and North Dakota were too many cupcakes.

RPI Group 1: they are 1-6. 7 chances to prove themselves against the so-called elite.
 

Adunk33

Well-known member
Staff member
Joined
Jul 21, 2017
Messages
10,004
isuquinndog said:
Jay Bilias said during the Iona game that RPI is dead.

I watched the first few minutes of that game and I've never heard a broadcaster seem so disappointed or unenthusiastic about a game. He seemed pretty pissed about calling the MAAC Championship.
 

MadBird

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 16, 2017
Messages
4,811
Location
Madison, Wisconsin
I will say this tho, in person Copeland, Palmer, and Roby were a handful. Watson's pretty okay, the big boy Tshimanga too. Beat Michigan by 20. Lost by one to Kansas (who ended up not being world beaters this year).

I think they're correctly on the bubble, a case can be made either way. I agree "the rest of us" are held to a higher standard.

Not a Tim Miles fan, but I've always liked asst. coach Molinari.
 
Top Bottom