Reggie Redbird
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jul 17, 2017
- Messages
- 1,801
Isn’t Petrakis a 1-year player here? He has played 4 prior seasons (1 at JUCO, 2 at K-State, 1 at WCU), so this is his 5th year.Pedon was establishing the coaching staff during the first month or 2 after his hire. They are huge part of recruiting and evaluating the talent that was on the team. He was also dealing with his OSU responsibilities for about 2 weeks. I dont think he hit the ground running on recruiting.
While he may not have had a huge disadvantage in the portal, he clearly would have a disadvantage in recruiting Freshman and JUCOs. He missed the early signing period and could not spend years/months developing relationships and selling them on ISU prior to his arrival Also, some coaches are able to take current players with them or recruits. Look at Indiana St, Northwestern St, and LSU and the players the coach took with them. It helps fill roster places but also helps jump start the program when players understand the system already.
Pedon didn't have the luxury of taking any Ohio St players to ISU.
I will offer my opinion on the 2 to 4 players that should potentially go
Andrews
Kotov
Schmidt
Petrakis
Sissoko
We all could point out something those 5 do well but the reality is all 5 have signifant areas they need to improve. These are not freshman. This is Schmidt's second year at D1 (with 2 at JUCO) and the others have played at least 3 years (includes this year) at D1 even if just sparingly. Kotov also has 2 years at JUCO. I am not saying all 5 will or should go but they are strong candidates. If Petrakis or someone turns it around between now and the end of the season that would be awesome. If not a change should seriously be considered by both sides.
I don't want to see continuous roster turnover but given the talent on the team and where we want to go, I think next year it will be warranted. In the meantime I will root whole heartedly for each of them when they are playing and I hope they prove me wrong.
I thought that was the reason we brought him in: height, could potentially provide post minutes, would not tie up a scholarship past this season.
Ultimately both parties need to make a decision. Each player with any potential eligibility will decide to continue playing, and Coach Pedom will decide if ISU offers that player a scholarship next year. Our roster didn’t allow for removing too many players because we weren’t going to get that many new players and the staff needed time to evaluate players with multiple years.
We could easily see over half our roster depart to eligibility exhaustion, graduation, or transfer. Whatever post(s) we need to lead Coach‘s offense is likely coming in as a transfer, giving Walker a chance to develop.
Specifically to this game, we did not quit. We could have easily packed up and lost by 30-40. If this team could solve getting down early and play like we did in the last 15 min all game, this team could win a lot more.
Last edited: