crazzymark
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2017
- Messages
- 1,903
Need to get rid of these games against Eastern and Western and division 2 schools and start getting good teams coming in and improve the strength of schedule.
main advantage is this ... very travel budget friendly .. can't ignore this aspect.Yeah- Mark, I can’t believe I’m agreeing with you, but there is no value in keeping two schools that may not actually exist in ten years on the schedule. The weird fascination with the rivalry with EIU is actually why I gave up my season tickets. It’s the perfect microcosm of why we are where we are.
Every one wants ISU to spend money and no one wants to donate it.
????? Last I looked ISU athletics was FCS football and one of the better funded athletic departments at the FCS level. Quinn...What am i missing?Every one wants ISU to spend money and no one wants to donate it.
It takes money to fly a full football team and equipment out to Northern Arizona, or Eastern Washington or whatever Big Sky team every one wants to do a H/H with. That's what I mean. There's a reason we play EIU and other midwest team. It's financially viable.????? Last I looked ISU athletics was FCS football and one of the better funded athletic departments at the FCS level. Quinn...What am i missing?
At least we get money for doing that, but yeah we are cutting into our own profits by having to go to Oklahoma. Its almost 10 hours by car to Norman, OK. They will probably fly. Oh and then they have to drive the equipment truck out there.Spack actually talked about this on his show. It's why the Iowa and Wisconsin games are so important. He actually said that the Oklahoma game in a couple years is less than ideal because of the travel costs.
Yep, my thought is to only do Big Sky option 2 of 4 years .. so it would only require extra travel budget 1 of 4 years.It takes money to fly a full football team and equipment out to Northern Arizona, or Eastern Washington or whatever Big Sky team every one wants to do a H/H with. That's what I mean. There's a reason we play EIU and other midwest team. It's financially viable.
I'm sure spack would love to go out west or to Delaware or wherever the good FCS schools are. But it takes money. Well funded or not, it's more money than we spend on travel now. Plus we have to go to the Dakota's every year and Ohio every few years.
AND the Eastern & Western games should give the Redbirds easy wins to go towards the (7) needed to make playoffs.Yep, my thought is to only do Big Sky option 2 of 4 years .. so it would only require extra travel budget 1 of 4 years.
But I obviously recognize the budget friendly aspect to the EIU and maybe even WIU as nonconf options.
Now the seating board is looking for schedule depth as well.AND the Eastern & Western games should give the Redbirds easy wins to go towards the (7) needed to make playoffs.
100% agreed, as long as we play in the MVFC as it stands today. And we always try to schedule an FBS .. usually a good to very good P5, but ok with an occasional weak P5 or a G5. That ratio could be 3 or 4 good FBS to 1 or 2 mediocre-weak FBS .. why this rationale ??AND the Eastern & Western games should give the Redbirds easy wins to go towards the (7) needed to make playoffs.