cubird said:Tulsa in 4th place in the American at 8-5.
Redbirds4Life said:cubird said:Tulsa in 4th place in the American at 8-5.
Being that ISU swept them this year, I can't imagine Tulsa is that much better than when they came to Normal. I wonder how Wichita State fans are feeling about the move, with the American only having 4 good teams (2 great with Wichita State/Cincinnati and 2 good with Temple/Houston). There are a lot of "junk" teams in that league. I always thought that Wichita State would have been much better to go to the Big 12, if they could have, or the Mountain West. Who knows if that was possible, but the AAC feels like a pretty "meh" move.
I think something might seriously be wrong with that team. Not that they can't figure it out, but man, that team that was cooking on all 4 burners last year after the loss in Normal, shouldn't be having trouble in that league. For them to have 3 losses and not have had played Cincinnati yet, is stunning to me.
Redbirds4Life said:I wonder how Wichita State fans are feeling about the move, with the American only having 4 good teams (2 great with Wichita State/Cincinnati and 2 good with Temple/Houston).cubird said:Tulsa in 4th place in the American at 8-5.
They are 20-5. That’s still pretty damn good. They listed SMU as a bad loss for them. It really wasn’t bad until all SMUs studs got hurt. Lunardi had SMU in the field around that timeframe. Now it looks bad.Adunk33 said:Redbirds4Life said:I wonder how Wichita State fans are feeling about the move, with the American only having 4 good teams (2 great with Wichita State/Cincinnati and 2 good with Temple/Houston).cubird said:Tulsa in 4th place in the American at 8-5.
I think they are feeling just fine. They have 3 conference losses and will still be an at-large team regardless. 3 losses in the MVC=NIT/CBI Bound
That's one drawback for wins against some programs. Loyola beat UF, but UF isn't thought of nearly as highly as when Loyola beat them. What looked like a marquee win may end up being a nice win . . . which don't count for much with the selection committee (unless you're from a P5).ISU FAN 1 said:They are 20-5. That’s still pretty damn good. They listed SMU as a bad loss for them. It really wasn’t bad until all SMUs studs got hurt. Lunardi had SMU in the field around that timeframe. Now it looks bad.Adunk33 said:Redbirds4Life said:I wonder how Wichita State fans are feeling about the move, with the American only having 4 good teams (2 great with Wichita State/Cincinnati and 2 good with Temple/Houston).
I think they are feeling just fine. They have 3 conference losses and will still be an at-large team regardless. 3 losses in the MVC=NIT/CBI Bound
bombay said:wichita fans are hilariously delusional. They think they're part of a power 6 conference.