cpacmel said:Question for Timmy and others:
3:28 left in the game. ISU scores a TD to make 38-20.
What’s the point of kicking the XP?
Math was never my best subject but doesn’t a 2 Pt conversion make much more sense?
bb fan said:Very, very bad last 5 minutes of the second quarter.
ekeyfanclub said:I don't think Davis has looked that good, but he hasn't been put in great situations. When we run twice and then have 3rd and long. It leads to difficult passing situations. If you switched him with Kolbe, I don't think it switches our record. The only game that is debatable is MSU.
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
fourthandshort said:ekeyfanclub said:I don't think Davis has looked that good, but he hasn't been put in great situations. When we run twice and then have 3rd and long. It leads to difficult passing situations. If you switched him with Kolbe, I don't think it switches our record. The only game that is debatable is MSU.
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
i think a higher % short to intermediate pass game keeps defenses from stacking the box against our run game.
cpacmel said:Question for Timmy and others:
3:28 left in the game. ISU scores a TD to make 38-20.
What’s the point of kicking the XP?
Math was never my best subject but doesn’t a 2 Pt conversion make much more sense?
RedbirdSoxFan said:TheTruth said:We should be looking for a new AD anyways, but if they don't make the playoffs because of the St. X game, Larry should be given his walking papers immediately.
Spack doesn’t schedule who he wants to schedule? Pretty sure Dan does most of his own scheduling.
cpacmel said:Question for Timmy and others:
3:28 left in the game. ISU scores a TD to make 38-20.
What’s the point of kicking the XP?
Math was never my best subject but doesn’t a 2 Pt conversion make much more sense?
ChiRedbirdfan said:cpacmel said:Question for Timmy and others:
3:28 left in the game. ISU scores a TD to make 38-20.
What’s the point of kicking the XP?
Math was never my best subject but doesn’t a 2 Pt conversion make much more sense?
I agree with you assessment. With that little amount of time remaining better to be down 2td's and need both two point conversions to tie (2 possessions total for 16 points) than to be down 2td's with traditional xps plus also needing an additional field goal to the tie the game (3 total possessions for 17 points). Odds of obtaining two more possessions to score and tie is slim with 3:28 remaining let alone needing 3 possessions to score to tie. I would say that is a poor critical thinking by the ISU staff.
fourthandshort said:I think the jumbo formation works just fine ... but mainly against weaker run defenses, like we we were playing up until WIU, NDSU, and SDSU. So agree we need to disguise our run game much better than we did.
Our problem is we (coaches and fans) annointed Davis too fast. He was unproven and hadn't taken meaningful live games snaps since HS. He got off to a good start against weaker competition. But teams scout and learn tendencies about players and offenses. They figured us out ... Davis is too inaccurate and doesn't run like anyone hoped he would. He needed to be brought along more slowly. OC Beathard can't lean on his occassional deep ball capabilities .. that won't move the chains.
We have great RBs .. all we need is a QB who can keep defenses honest and spread out. Kolbe does that, Davis does not. Coaches are responsible for annointing Davis too soon. I hated the comparisons to Roberson ... he was a proven player at Indiana who saw meaningful game reps in Big 10. He was worth the gamble ... and even as he struggled his first 8 games in 2014, he could run and throw a deep ball .. plus we had a very talented senior oriented WR/TE group. I love Schnell (one bone headed play does not discourage me in the least), and love the upside on Edgar and Haley ... but they are all small with small catch radius Betting on an inaccurate QB because he "looks" more comfortable in the pocket was a risky bet. Good defenses were bound to cause us problems. And now our run game is suffering because we are playing much better defenses who have had a chance to scout us.
By the way, I didn't think Kolbe looked at all in sync yesterday. He gutted out some impressive runs, and made some throws. But he was not hitting people in stride and he threw to no one twice ... so someone missed a route adjustment (Kolbe or WR ?). Give him a full week of reps with the 1's .. and he'll start to get his accuracy back. And yes, he will "look" more uncomfortable than Davis in the pocket. But he will gut it out and he will hit open receivers in stride in short to intermediate pass game .. this will take pressure off OL and run game.
Going to platoon now would look foolish as a program. After SIU, I stopped talking about platooning Kolbe because I do agree we need to pick one. Now I don't know what the answer is. I do know Davis needs more time to figure this all out.
Chi-bird said:fourthandshort said:I think the jumbo formation works just fine ... but mainly against weaker run defenses, like we we were playing up until WIU, NDSU, and SDSU. So agree we need to disguise our run game much better than we did.
Our problem is we (coaches and fans) annointed Davis too fast. He was unproven and hadn't taken meaningful live games snaps since HS. He got off to a good start against weaker competition. But teams scout and learn tendencies about players and offenses. They figured us out ... Davis is too inaccurate and doesn't run like anyone hoped he would. He needed to be brought along more slowly. OC Beathard can't lean on his occassional deep ball capabilities .. that won't move the chains.
We have great RBs .. all we need is a QB who can keep defenses honest and spread out. Kolbe does that, Davis does not. Coaches are responsible for annointing Davis too soon. I hated the comparisons to Roberson ... he was a proven player at Indiana who saw meaningful game reps in Big 10. He was worth the gamble ... and even as he struggled his first 8 games in 2014, he could run and throw a deep ball .. plus we had a very talented senior oriented WR/TE group. I love Schnell (one bone headed play does not discourage me in the least), and love the upside on Edgar and Haley ... but they are all small with small catch radius Betting on an inaccurate QB because he "looks" more comfortable in the pocket was a risky bet. Good defenses were bound to cause us problems. And now our run game is suffering because we are playing much better defenses who have had a chance to scout us.
By the way, I didn't think Kolbe looked at all in sync yesterday. He gutted out some impressive runs, and made some throws. But he was not hitting people in stride and he threw to no one twice ... so someone missed a route adjustment (Kolbe or WR ?). Give him a full week of reps with the 1's .. and he'll start to get his accuracy back. And yes, he will "look" more uncomfortable than Davis in the pocket. But he will gut it out and he will hit open receivers in stride in short to intermediate pass game .. this will take pressure off OL and run game.
Going to platoon now would look foolish as a program. After SIU, I stopped talking about platooning Kolbe because I do agree we need to pick one. Now I don't know what the answer is. I do know Davis needs more time to figure this all out.
Even if Kolbe becomes the starter it does not mean that the coaches made the wrong decision in starting Davis. Players play their way in and out of the lineup.
I hoped that Davis would have played better by now, but he still gives us the best chance to make it to Frisco this year. His best is better than Kolbe’s best. Unfortunately, we might not see his best often enough.
Birdswin said:RedbirdSoxFan said:TheTruth said:We should be looking for a new AD anyways, but if they don't make the playoffs because of the St. X game, Larry should be given his walking papers immediately.
Spack doesn’t schedule who he wants to schedule? Pretty sure Dan does most of his own scheduling.
RedbirdSoxFan - this was already discussed extensively before and right after the St. X game. This was 100% scheduled by AD Lyons period. In fact, Spack has little input into the schedule - 8 conference games, 1 non-con vs EIU, usually one FBS - that leaves only one other game. Lyons wanted 6 home games no matter what - end of discussion.
MadBird said:The biggest puzzle to me was the run game - how in the heck did they shut down JRob like that? Who schemes the run game, the OL coach or the OC?? I mean, come up with some plays for crissakes. Same old dive plays for the most part, poor blocking, etc. Due credit to SDSU, but come on, shouldn't be that hard to come up with a few plays that work.
I really thought, and sort of still think, our OL is big and tough and solid. But they've had some games where they just didn't get the job done. Poor preparation, game planning, or poor performance???
These two comments sum it up for me. Even if you subtract the three mistakes and 21 pts that came with them, the remarks stand as typed. We are vulnerable to having box stacked on us. Roberson made up for the lack of a consistent short/medium passing game with a huge RO threat. Early comments lead us to believe Davis might pose a similar threat. Looks like our O has serious vulnerabilities, particularly against smaller/faster front sevens.Virginia Redbird said:This is not hindsight, Davis lack of consistency in his accuracy throwing the ball has been apparent all season long. He hits some on target but even with some completed passes, they were more great catches than accurate throws. The beginning of the schedule was soft...very, very soft. The NDSU game was close on the scoreboard but it looked to me that the Bison took their foot off the pedal in the second half and were just cruising to another win over the Birds. The schedule is into the tougher teams now and it is showing. They stack the box and shut down the run. They seem to be comfortable facing the Redbirds passing game and you can't really blame them. A couple big plays but if you are essentially a running team you have to be able to move the chains and take some pressure off the run game and OL with some consistency or the opponent will just fill the box. I don't care how good you are, if they are putting 8 men in the box it will be hard for the OL to open holes and for the RB's to find open space. I am not saying Kolbe is the answer but the love fest some had with Davis early on was looking through rose-colored glasses. He has some real strengths but consistent accuracy is not one of them. These last two losses were to top-ranked teams but I fear the MoState and StX games may well have done in the Birds chances for a playoff spot this year. I definitely think they have to win out to have any chance of a playoff bid.
I didn't see any of the game. Went to Happy Valley. If you've never been...GO.cpacmel said:Question for Timmy and others:
3:28 left in the game. ISU scores a TD to make 38-20.
What’s the point of kicking the XP?
Math was never my best subject but doesn’t a 2 Pt conversion make much more sense?