Brennan Resigns

She_Also_Said

New member
Joined
Jan 19, 2020
Messages
12
Really, they just stopped by for a bite? The expenses were submitted as reimbursements after the trip so, no, they were not approved in advance that is false. The AD's expenses are signed off on by the president and the foundation processes them. Athletics does have their own separate audit done each year (they are external auditors, not internal - Streigel does that audit I believe). I don't know that at the time Rossi's legal 'issues' were fully known but the pledge was brought to the attention of management last year about being written off and wasn't so that is really the story now. Could have been avoided. That pledge is the loose end that brought all of this other stuff out.
I know for a fact they were approved prior to the trip and it is in writing. ISU does internal auditing which Athletics did have done.
 

Birdfriend72

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 6, 2017
Messages
1,934
It's being reported by the ISU NPR station. I'd say it's pretty solid. Anything reported by news outlets is fair game.
He resigned. Has to be pretty strong. This sucks too. Because it puts us behind a bit. Hopefully we bring in a stud for AD!
 

Bird Friend

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 17, 2017
Messages
12,585
I know for a fact they were approved prior to the trip and it is in writing. ISU does internal auditing which Athletics did go have done.
How do you approve of an Uber beforehand, especially one from a strip club’s address . . . ? Considering that kind of expense would to go thru the Foundation management, I’m finding it extremely difficult to believe anything you’re saying. Granted your first comment made believing really, really hard.
 

cicada_jimmy01

New member
Joined
Jul 21, 2017
Messages
28
I know for a fact they were approved prior to the trip and it is in writing. ISU does internal auditing which Athletics did have done.
approved by whom? I know for a fact that the foundation office doesn't approve the AD's expenses. That is done by the supervisor, which in this case would be the president's office
 

Bird Friend

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 17, 2017
Messages
12,585
approved by whom? I know for a fact that the foundation office doesn't approve the AD's expenses. That is done by the supervisor, which in this case would be the president's office
If it involves Foundation $$, then the Foundation has to approve. And this involved Foundation $$.
 

She_Also_Said

New member
Joined
Jan 19, 2020
Messages
12
Also...something to think about...jmo, but SOMEONE tipped off WGLT to this story. Now isn't that interesting...

How do you approve of an Uber beforehand, especially one from a strip club’s address . . . ? Considering that kind of expense would to go thru the Foundation management, I’m finding it extremely difficult to believe anything you’re saying. Granted your first comment made believing really, really hard.
The tickets for the game had pre-approval. Ubers are not something you need prior approval for. You don't have to believe me. I am not here to make anyone believe me. I just don't think it is right that facts are missing which skew perceptions.
 

Adunk33

Well-known member
Staff member
Joined
Jul 21, 2017
Messages
10,006
The tickets for the game had pre-approval. Ubers are not something you need prior approval for. You don't have to believe me. I am not here to make anyone believe me. I just don't think it is right that facts are missing which skew perceptions.
Could you lay out the facts, then? What happened that the article is choosing to leave out?
 
B

BirdGrad2011

Guest
The tickets for the game had pre-approval. Ubers are not something you need prior approval for. You don't have to believe me. I am not here to make anyone believe me. I just don't think it is right that facts are missing which skew perceptions.
What if you’re just like me? The article has some truths. The relationship with Rossi is sketchy at best since the indictment. Do I think we know all? No. Do I think everything with this individual was on the up and up? Probably not. Am I saying Brennan or Marty are 100% guilt of wrongdoing? No.

This just seems like a black eye for ISU and that there is more to the story.
 

Rollbirds5

Active member
Joined
Jul 17, 2017
Messages
481
Location
Chicago
There is a White Castle next to Red Garter, I’m sure the boys just stopped in for some sliders before getting the uber
 

fdbird83

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 19, 2017
Messages
1,440
The tickets for the game had pre-approval. Ubers are not something you need prior approval for. You don't have to believe me. I am not here to make anyone believe me. I just don't think it is right that facts are missing which skew perceptions.
Please don't bring facts to this and screw with our skewed perceptions.
 

cicada_jimmy01

New member
Joined
Jul 21, 2017
Messages
28
Could you lay out the facts, then? What happened that the article is choosing to leave out?
I don't particularly like Ryan but he did a pretty good of reporting here. I don't think he left anything out I just think he doesn't have all the facts. The strip club thing is a very bad look and no that would not have 'approved' of by anyone at the foundation or in the president's office. The main issue here is that the pledge remained around long enough to unravel all of these other things. That's the question Ryan should be asking - why did that happen? Had it been removed as soon as Rossi's problems came to light probably none of these other things come out.
 

Sladerunningbear

Active member
Joined
Jul 18, 2017
Messages
918
I would assume that they found somewhere in the area to sit until things died down. They are at a Big Ten Game and there are Bars and food spots all right there in that area
They were only being gracious because it was so crowded there weren’t enough seats so they let some ladies kindly sit on their laps. Gentlemen, I say, and should be promoted. It was obvious!
 
Top Bottom