GratefulRed
Member
- Joined
- Oct 14, 2017
- Messages
- 98
No surprise, the athletic practice facility will be built on the field north of Horton and between G83 and the track.
While I pretty much agree with this, you know, when our "big donor" finally appears and makes the "lead gift", the bricks and mortar structure might appear. Somebody just gotta keep workin' to find him or her (as I've pointed out before, her = Tricia Griffith, CEO of Progressive Insurance, ISU alum. If she's got enough dough to pay for those goddam Flo commercials, she should have enough for the old alma mater!! )We definitely have to have something. Sad thing is if we go with the bubble then I don't think we see a brick and mortar structure for another 30 years. Hell, football could be outlawed by then.
I don't think that is entirely fair. How many times have you seen ISU football sell out since 2016? 4? Maybe 5? How many times has ISU football made a profit ...ever? I don't suspect a ton. We are a high end FCS football team and a new stadium, new field and brand new bubble to practice in over a 15 year span is pretty damn good if you ask me. I think you guys that are leaning on a 20M indoor football field and training facility and a horseshoe we have shown zero chance of filling in recent years is nuts.Instead of half-assing it and building a cheap ass bubble, why don't they hire an A.D. who knows how to fundraise and put the project in his/her lap? Completely whiffing on this really kind of sums up Lyons tenure here and I'd hate to see some crappy tent out there just so Larry can save a little face on this.
If that’s the case, then just think of all the money we saved . . .We definitely have to have something. Sad thing is if we go with the bubble then I don't think we see a brick and mortar structure for another 30 years. Hell, football could be outlawed by then.
Nobody in the administration said this is "Done." Re-read the Pantagraph articleSo going to give AD Lyons credit for at least getting us what we "need" .. well done !!!
My bad .. flow of thread threw me off. But youre right, this only says, they are moving from brick and mortar to bubble concept and the new AD will continue this pursuit.Nobody in the administration said this is "Done." Re-read the Pantagraph article
Illinois State President Larry Dietz discusses plans to hire a new director of athletics
Illinois State University president Larry Dietz hopes to have a new director of athletics named by the end of the calendar year.www.pantagraph.com
My bad .. flow of thread threw me off. But youre right, this only says, they are moving from brick and mortar to bubble concept and the new AD will continue this pursuit.
Interesting what Dietrz said he is looking for in new AD
Dietz would like a new director of athletics who has “vision for the athletic department about where we are and where we might be able to go, expertise in fundraising and individuals who have addressed diversity and equity within existing programs or who have plans to enhance that."
I'm 100% on board with new AD having these attributes as strengths in comparison to Lyons.
Let's go Zenger !!!!
I get what you're saying, but I also understand where Dietz is coming from. He didn't have the vision. Dietz wasn't chosen when he interviewed for the job as Prez, he was selected after Flanagan and wife bombed in Blo/No. He was an emergency selection to deal with a PR crisis, not unlike Lyons. We just happened to have been gifted with two solid and competent, though not particularly charismatic or future-oriented individuals.You know, thinking back to when I first read that article, I thought to myself, shouldn't the UNIVERSITY have the vision of where they want to, and then look for the person to get us there? Instead, we're hiring someone who has a vision for ISU w/o knowing whether that's where anyone wants to go or whether it's realistic?? But I get it, if you get the right person, the right leadership skills, they get you going "somewhere".
I'm good with a bubble, would be nice to get "bricks and mortar", but agree a bubble is better than nothing.
That looks pretty good. I would've thought Cincy had an indoor place. What's funny is right after that video was one for U of Fla. They have a nice indoor place! In Florida? Like they really need it. Poor babies....gets down to 40 degrees I bet on some winter days. You can break a nail in that kind of frigid weather.BUBBLE UP! There's no need to feel bad if we can't do a brick and mortar building. It's really about functionality. Look at what the Univ of Cincinnati has -
Inside UC's Practice Bubble - YouTube
Wouldn't it be sweet to have one of these. UC is currently ranked #6 in the FBS and they are a candidate for the CFP. Let's get a good AD and make this happen.
The football team has sold out many times since 2016. As for a profit I do not think any non power five team is making a profit. I do agree with you that we will not find the funds to pay for a 20M IPF.I don't think that is entirely fair. How many times have you seen ISU football sell out since 2016? 4? Maybe 5? How many times has ISU football made a profit ...ever? I don't suspect a ton. We are a high end FCS football team and a new stadium, new field and brand new bubble to practice in over a 15 year span is pretty damn good if you ask me. I think you guys that are leaning on a 20M indoor football field and training facility and a horseshoe we have shown zero chance of filling in recent years is nuts.
We are in the middle of a pandemic. Sports arent being played, scholarships are being placed on hold, no money is coming into the University Athletic Dept hardly at all and pouting that you aren't getting a U of I or NIU level facility, having to settle for a brand new multi-million dollar bubble comes off as tone deaf to the world around you.
1.5 million? Does that include installation? I'm hearing that it will cost us over 5X that amount - so north of 7.5 - (seriously). For starters the practice field area behind Horton is not a suitable base. A lot of prep work would need to be done before you could even start putting up the dome.A top of the line dome like the one at Cincy goes for about $15 a square ft. At 100,000 square feet, we're talking about 1.5 million. Compare that to $20 million and the dome has been a no-brainer since day one. It's long overdue. Just make sure it's red and white and not all white like the infamous towels.